Paul Jones offers insight into the recent cases that deal with Part 36 offers and fixed costs ‘On the question of whether the costs should be standard or indemnity basis, the defendant’s position was that the court should only order costs on the indemnity basis as a form of punishment for inappropriate conduct that merited …
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Broadhurst v Tan; Taylor v Smith  EWCA Civ 94
- Car Craft Test Centre & John Martin v Kirsty Trotman & Advantage Insurance Company (2017) unreported, Stoke County Court, DJ Etherington, 3 February
- Fitzpatrick Contractors Ltd v Tyco Fire and Integrated Solutions (UK) Ltd  EWHC 274 (TCC)
- Sutherland v Khan (2016) unreported Hull CC DJ Besford 21 April