Costs: To fix or not to fix?

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | November 2017 #160
Paul Jones considers the potential conflict between fixed costs and Part 36 offers ‘Could the court, following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer in a fixed-costs case, make an order for the costs incurred in the late period to be paid in addition to the fixed costs?’ The system of fixed costs, which covers …

Continue reading "Costs: To fix or not to fix?"

This post is only available to members.

Part 36 Offers: Looking for explicit instructions

Burcher Jennings Legal Pricing & Costs Consultants | Personal Injury Law Journal | April 2017 #154
Melanie Homersham investigates entitlement to indemnity costs after the late acceptance of a Part 36 offer ‘It is important to note there is no automatic entitlement to costs on the indemnity basis if a paying party accepts the claimant’s Part 36 offer after the 21-day period and there has been no judgment.’ One of the …

Continue reading "Part 36 Offers: Looking for explicit instructions"

This post is only available to members.

Costs: Last minute decisions

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | March 2017 #153
Paul Jones offers insight into the recent cases that deal with Part 36 offers and fixed costs ‘On the question of whether the costs should be standard or indemnity basis, the defendant’s position was that the court should only order costs on the indemnity basis as a form of punishment for inappropriate conduct that merited …

Continue reading "Costs: Last minute decisions"

This post is only available to members.