The ‘without prejudice‘ rule: A sacred right?

The Royal Court of Guernsey has dismissed an application to admit privileged communications. Joseph de Lacey discusses ‘In order to test the decision-making process, D applied for disclosure of documents evidencing the decision and the decision-making process, permission to adduce expert evidence as to the trusts‘ value, and permission to cross-examine the trustees.‘ The Royal …
This post is only available to members.

Construction Focus: Time for a new privilege?

In the second of two articles focusing on mediation, John Starr considers confidentiality and privilege ‘It is clear that communications that take place in the context of mediation are confidential and the parties will often sign a mediation agreement to that effect.’ In last month’s column, I looked at the question of whether the enthusiasm …
This post is only available to members.

Libertarian Investments Ltd v Hall FACV Nos 14 & 16 of 2012

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | March 2015 #147

W and the defendant embarked on a project with the aim of acquiring a substantial interest in an English company, TSE, which started with the acquisition of 125,000 TSE shares in 2002 (the first tranche). In 2003 they attempted to make additional acquisitions of TSE shares, such attempts involving three of W’s companies, including the plaintiff. The overall scheme was that funds would be provided by one company, Assanzon, for the acquisition of shares for another company, Momentum, which were held for its beneficial owners which were principally the plaintiff company, Libertarian. The fu...

Privilege: Negotiation with prejudice

Clare Toomer considers the decision in Avonwick v Webinvest [2014] ‘Parties should be aware that while the express marking of documents as without prejudice remains a highly material factor in determining their status, it is not conclusive.’ It is often thought that heading a letter ‘without prejudice’ will protect it from being disclosed later in …
This post is only available to members.

Settlement Discussions: EAT aims to end dispute over without prejudice rule

A recent ruling has provided welcome clarification of when pre-termination negotiations should remain privileged, report Johanna Johnson and Ronan O’Reilly ‘There are eight recognised exceptions to the application of the without prejudice rule, which were set out by Robert Walker LJ in Unilever plc v The Procter & Gamble Co [2000].’ The ‘without prejudice’ privilege …
This post is only available to members.

In Practice: Always a privilege?

Helen Cort examines the nature of without prejudice communications, competing public interests and privilege in ADR It appears that while mediation involving children matters does attract special protection, there is not a blanket exemption covering all mediation. Family lawyers will be familiar with without prejudice communications, but how often is a query raised as to …
This post is only available to members.

Discrimination Law: Claims by equity partners

Employment tribunals are increasingly having to resolve discrimination claims brought against partnerships. Suzanne McKie and Laura Bell look at the key issues ‘When seeking to resolve disputes within a partnership structure, it is common to have informal “without-prejudice chats” between partners to keep disputes low-key.’It is fair to say that equity partners are becoming increasingly …
This post is only available to members.