Continue reading "The ‘without prejudice‘ rule: A sacred right?"
This post is only available to members.
The ‘without prejudice‘ rule: A sacred right?
The Royal Court of Guernsey has dismissed an application to admit privileged communications. Joseph de Lacey discusses ‘In order to test the decision-making process, D applied for disclosure of documents evidencing the decision and the decision-making process, permission to adduce expert evidence as to the trusts‘ value, and permission to cross-examine the trustees.‘ The Royal …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd & anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1436
- Cutts v Head [1983] EWCA Civ 8
- Forster v Friedland (1992) unreported Court of Appeal Hoffman LJ 10 November
- Linsen International Ltd v Humpuss Sea Transport PTE Ltd [2010] EWHC 303 (Comm); [2011] EWHC 2339 (Comm)
- Pearson Education Ltd v Prentice Hall India Private Ltd [2005] EWHC 636 (QB)
- Public Trustee v Cooper [2001] WTLR 901 ChD
- Rothschild Switzerland (CI) Trustees Ltd & ors v W & ors: The ‘R‘ Trusts (2017) Guernsey Judgment 43/2017 Royal Court of Guernsey 2 October
- Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council [1988] UKHL 7
- Savings & Investment Bank Ltd v Fincken [2003] EWCA Civ 1630
- Unilever plc v The Procter & Gamble Company [1999] EWCA Civ 3027