Continue reading "Law of Property (Misc. Provisions) Act 1989: Proprietary estoppel wins again"
This post is only available to members.
Law of Property (Misc. Provisions) Act 1989: Proprietary estoppel wins again
Sukhninder Panesar considers the case law relating to proprietary estoppel when seeking to acquire an interest in land without complying with the formalities of the 1989 Act Etherton J held that the proprietary estoppel was sufficient grounds for the enforcement of the terms of the oral contract. The question whether proprietary estoppel can be pleaded …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Attorney General of Hong Kong v Humphrey’s Estate (Queen’s Gardens) Ltd [1987] AC 114
- Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & ors [2005] EWHC 266 (Ch); [2005] WTLR 625 ChD
- Davies & anr v Davies [2016] EWCA Civ 463
- Gillet v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66
- Jennings v Rice & ors [2002] EWCA Civ 159; [2002] WTLR 367 CA
- Taylor Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd [1982] QB 133
- Thorner v Major & ors [2009] UKHL 18; [2009] WTLR 713 HL
- Wills & ors v Sowray [2020] EWHC 939 (Ch)
- Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & anor v Cobbe [2006] EWCA Civ 1139; [2006] WTLR 1473 CA
- Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & anor v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55; [2008] WTLR 1461 HL