Trial attendance; struck out claims ‘This decision of the High Court gives helpful guidance on the meaning of not attending trial under r39.3.’ Rule 39.3(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules allows the court to strike out a claimant’s claim if the claimant does not attend trial. In this case, the claimants left it too late …
Continue reading "Case report: Akita v Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland  EWHC 1712 (QB)"
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Akita & anor v Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland  EWHC 1712 (QB)