This post is only available to members.
Case report: Akita v Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland [2019] EWHC 1712 (QB)
Trial attendance; struck out claims ‘This decision of the High Court gives helpful guidance on the meaning of not attending trial under r39.3.’ Rule 39.3(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules allows the court to strike out a claimant’s claim if the claimant does not attend trial. In this case, the claimants left it too late …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Akita & anor v Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland [2019] EWHC 1712 (QB)