Continue reading "Enfranchisement: Room for reform"
This post is only available to members.
Enfranchisement: Room for reform
Natasha Rees reviews the most important enfranchisement cases of 2018 ‘The case confirms that there is no general proposition that a landlord can refuse consent to assign, alter or change the use of premises on the grounds that it might lead to enfranchisement and loss of the landlord’s interest.’ The government has been busy pursuing …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Aldford House Freehold Ltd v Grosvenor (Mayfair) Estate & anor [2018] EWHC 3430 (Ch)
- Bickel v Duke of Westminster [1976] 3 All ER 801
- Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties & ors [2008] UKHL 5
- Cutter & ors v Pry Ltd [2014] UKUT 215 (LC)
- Fluss v Queensbridge Terrace Residents Ltd [2011] UKUT 285 (LC)
- Francia Properties Ltd v St James House Freehold Ltd [2018] UKUT 79 (LC)
- Norfolk Capital Group Ltd v Kitway Ltd [1976] 3 All ER 787
- Pepper v Hart [1992] UKHL 3
- Rotrust Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 765
- The Corporation of Trinity Houseof Deptford Strond v 4-6 Trinity Church Square Freehold Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 764
- Villarosa v Ryan [2018] EWHC 1914 (Ch)
- Whitehall Court London Ltd v The Crown Estate Commissioners [2018] EWCA Civ 1704