Continue reading "In practice: Conflicting views"
This post is only available to members.
In practice: Conflicting views
Chrissie Cuming Walters highlights the dichotomy of modern family law on financial provision: autonomy versus paternalism ‘The fairness of provision in any nuptial agreement entered into is likely to erode over time and potentially be subsumed by changing circumstances through the passage of time, allowing for an increased use of paternalism.’ Many practitioners would agree …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- A v A [2018] EWHC 340 (Fam)
- BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
- KA v MA (Prenuptial Agreement: Needs) [2018] EWHC 499 (Fam)
- Kelley v Corston [1998] 3 WLR 246
- Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 2571 (Fam); [2010] EWHC 3091 (Fam); [2012] EWHC 45 (Fam)
- Luckwell v Limata [2014] EWHC 502 (Fam)
- Mills v Mills [2017] EWCA Civ 129; [2018] UKSC 38
- Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42; WTLR(w) 2010-13
- Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727
- WW v HW [2015] EWHC 1844 (Fam)
- Xydhias v Xydhias [1998] EWCA Civ 1966