Construction focus: Timing is everything

Two recent cases have examined the interaction between the timeframe for an adjudication and an adjudicator’s right to resign. John Starr reports ‘Jacobs’ case was that the parties had agreed that the dispute should be referred to an adjudicator and that the adjudication should be conducted in accordance with an agreed timetable. Skanska’s case was …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced

  • Baldwin & anor v J R Pickstock Ltd [2017] EWHC 2456 (TCC)
  • Jacobs UK Ltd v Skanska Construction UK Ltd [2017] EWHC 2395 (TCC)