Continue reading "Financial Provision: Fair shares?"
This post is only available to members.
Financial Provision: Fair shares?
Michael Gouriet and Natalie O’Shea consider the validity of the compensation argument in financial remedy proceedings ‘Do family lawyers need to quantify a client’s potential claims on an “either/or” basis (loss-related and needs-related) so as to be prepared to run the case either way?’ The Court of Appeal judgment in H v H [2014] confirms …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- CR v CR [2007] EWHC 3334 (Fam)
- H v H [2014] EWHC 760 (Fam); [2014] EWCA Civ 1523
- Lauder v Lauder [2007] EWHC 1227 (Fam)
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- RP v RP [2006] EWHC 3409 (Fam)
- SA v PA (Premarital Agreement: Compensation) [2014] EWHC 392 (Fam)
- VB v JP [2008] EWHC 112 (Fam)
- White v White [2000] UKHL 54