Standard Of Living: Lifestyle factors

Hazel Wright and Phoebe Sutton suggest that despite the provisions of section 25 the standard of living of the parties is becoming less relevant ‘It is hard to see future courts awarding periodical payments based on the standard of living in the great majority of marriages.’ When family lawyers of a certain generation die, they …
This post is only available to members.

Variation: Finality and fairness

Ed Heaton examines recent developments regarding applications to vary periodical payments and the potential impact of pension reform ‘Any ongoing payments should only be made for such period as the court considers sufficient for the recipient to “adjust without undue hardship to the termination of those payments”.’ The continuing, steady trickle of reported cases relating …
This post is only available to members.

Financial Provision: Fair shares?

Michael Gouriet and Natalie O’Shea consider the validity of the compensation argument in financial remedy proceedings ‘Do family lawyers need to quantify a client’s potential claims on an “either/or” basis (loss-related and needs-related) so as to be prepared to run the case either way?’ The Court of Appeal judgment in H v H [2014] confirms …
This post is only available to members.

Periodical Payments: Finding closure

Alison Green draws practical points for practitioners on variation of periodical payments from the decision in H v H div class=”pullquote”>’It is desirable to bring the parties’ financial dependency to an end – a clean break is important financially and psychologically, not only to prevent further litigation between the parties but also to exercise the …
This post is only available to members.