Continue reading "Pre-nups and private client: Take note"
This post is only available to members.
Pre-nups and private client: Take note
Mark Pawlowski considers a recent decision on the enforceability of pre-nuptial agreements ‘It was essential that both parties should have entered into the agreement of their own free will without undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation, and with a full appreciation of its implications.’ The recent Court of Appeal decision in Versteegh v Versteegh [2018] has …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AH v PH [2013] EWHC 3873 (Fam)
- B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)
- BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
- DB v PB (Financial Provision) (Prenuptial Agreement: Prorogation Clause) [2016] EWHC 3431 (Fam)
- Gray v Work [2015] EWHC 834 (Fam)
- GS v L (Financial Remedies: Pre-acquired Assets: Needs) [2011] EWHC 1759 (Fam)
- H v H [2016] EWFC B81
- Hopkins v Hopkins [2015] EWHC 812 (Fam)
- KA v MA (Prenuptial Agreement: Needs) [2018] EWHC 499 (Fam)
- Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 2571 (Fam); [2010] EWHC 3091 (Fam); [2012] EWHC 45 (Fam)
- Lilleyman v Lilleyman [2012] WTLR 1007; [2012] WTLR 1033 (costs)
- Luckwell v Limata [2014] EWHC 502 (Fam)
- Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42; WTLR(w) 2010-13
- SA v PA (Premarital Agreement: Compensation) [2014] EWHC 392 (Fam)
- Sargeant v Sargeant & anor [2018] EWHC 8 (Ch); [2018] WTLR 1451 ChD
- V v V [2011] EWHC 3230 (Fam)
- Versteegh v Versteegh [2018] EWCA Civ 1050
- WW v HW [2015] EWHC 1844 (Fam)
- Y v Y [2014] EWHC 2920 (Fam)
- Z v Z [2011] EWHC 2878 (Fam)