September 2012 #108 Issue Archives | Legalease Law Journals

The Extent Of Insurance Cover: The ‘wrong’ type of use

Pannone, part of Slater & Gordon | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

Richard Scorer and Malcom Johnson consider insurers’ liability for sexual assaults in a motor vehicle

Costs: Reversing the normal rule in CPR 36

QM Legal Costs | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

Paul Jones looks at the latest case concerning Part 36 offers

Case Report: JGE v The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938

12 King's Bench Walk (Chambers of Paul Russell QC) | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

Test for vicarious liability; cumulative approach

Detailed Assessment: The provisional assessment pilot scheme: going 20% wrong

Taylor Rose Law | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

Matthew Hoe assesses the teething problems that may arise from rolling out the programme nationally

Reform: General damages on the up – Simmons v Castle

Crown Office Chambers | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

Peter Houghton considers the consequences of implementing The Jackson Report’s recommendation

PI Blog: Advocate’s advice

Exchange Chambers | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

Bill Braithwaite QC examines the problems that can arise with Roberts v Johnstone calculations and potential solutions

Burden Of Proof: Loss of chance

Kingsley Napley LLP | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

Suzanne Farg and Verity Danziger discuss the hurdles to overcome to establish a claim

The Discount Rate: Damages

Nestor Partnership | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2012 #108

A sign of movement in the discount rate saga takes the form of a Consultation Paper, inviting those with an interest in personal injury claims to respond by 23 October 2012. Andrew Sands and Nick Leech analyse the dual approach that the Consultation appears to be taking.

Personal Injury Law Journal: September 2012 #108