Skip to content
  • Home
  • Journals
    • The Commercial Litigation Journal
    • Employment Law Journal
    • Family Law Journal
    • Personal Injury Law Journal
    • Procurement & Outsourcing Journal
    • Property Law Journal
    • Trusts & Estates Law and Tax Journal
  • WTLR
  • Search
  • Contact
    • Advertising
    • Subscriptions
    • Privacy Policy
  • Indices

Family Law Journal: October 2017 #170

International Focus: La vita familiare

Stowe Family Law logo Stowe Family Law | Family Law Journal | October 2017 #170

Marco Calabrese and Rebecca Harling outline the approach to divorce and finances in Italy

Continue Reading

Financial Provision: An open door

Mishcon de Reya logo Mishcon de Reya | Family Law Journal | October 2017 #170

David Hickmott examines the Supreme Court decision in Birch v Birch and the importance of the discretionary jurisdiction in the family courts

Continue Reading

Non-Matrimonial Property: Beyond reach?

Seddons logo Seddons | Family Law Journal | October 2017 #170

In the conclusion to a two-part analysis, Deborah Jeff considers the law on non-matrimonial assets and the key principles applied

Continue Reading

Private Children: Divided loyalties

Hall Brown logo Hall Brown | Family Law Journal | October 2017 #170

Laura Guillon looks at change of residence orders in private law proceedings, and the need for properly formulated arguments at first instance

Continue Reading

Trusts: Defined purpose

Weightmans LLP logo Weightmans LLP | Family Law Journal | October 2017 #170

Fiona O’Sullivan analyses the approach of the Court of Appeal in a case concerned with charitable trust assets

Continue Reading

Conduct: The blame game

Wedlake Bell LLP logo Wedlake Bell LLP | Family Law Journal | October 2017 #170

Natasha Kurth suggests that arguments as to conduct should be rare in financial proceedings, and approached with caution

Continue Reading

Child Support: A change for the worse

Hart Brown logo Hart Brown | Family Law Journal | October 2017 #170

Vanessa McMurtrie and Catherine Poleykett comment on the decision in Green v Adams and the interaction between applications under Sch 1 to the Children Act 1989 and maintenance assessments

Continue Reading

Login

  • Lost Password

Search the site...

© Legalease Ltd, 188 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG