Amy Harris looks at the requirements as to service to seise jurisdiction, and whether a delay in serving a divorce petition may impact on the priority of proceedings
You must be logged in and have an active subscription to view full content.
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- MH v MH  EUECJ C-173/16
- P v M  EUECJ C-507/14
- R v R (Divorce: Stay of Proceedings)  2 FLR 1036
- SK Slavia Praha-Fotbal AS v Debt Collect London Ltd & anor  EWCA Civ 1250
- Thum v Thum  EWHC 2634 (Fam);  EWCA Civ 624
- UBS AG, London Branch & anor v Kommunale Wasserwerke Leipzig GmbH  EWHC 2566 (Comm)