Continue reading "Pre-nuptial agreements: Agreeing to disagree"
This post is only available to members.
Pre-nuptial agreements: Agreeing to disagree
Vikkie Chetcuti examines case law developments on pre-nuptial agreements, in particular as to legal advice, jurisdiction clauses, needs and sharing, in the post-Radmacher era ‘In Brack the Court of Appeal grappled with the issue of whether the mere existence of a valid pre-nuptial agreement meant the court was constrained as a matter of course from …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)
- Brack v Brack [2018] EWCA Civ 2862
- Hart v Hart [2017] EWCA Civ 1306
- KA v MA (Prenuptial Agreement – Needs) [2018] WTLR 125
- Luckwell v Limata [2014] EWHC 502 (Fam)
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42; WTLR(w) 2010-13
- Versteegh v Versteegh [2018] EWCA Civ 1050
- Wells v Wells [2002] EWCA Civ 476
- Z v Z [2011] EWHC 2878 (Fam)