September 2012 #133 Issue Archives | Legalease Law Journals

Tribunal Fees: Attack on justice or encouragement to settle?

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP | Employment Law Journal | September 2012 #133

Christine Young and Hester Cooper consider the legal and practical issues surrounding the introduction of fees in the employment tribunal

Tribunal Procedure: Rewriting the rule book

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP | Employment Law Journal | September 2012 #133

Sarah Ozanne examines Underhill J’s proposals for improved employment tribunal case-management powers and for a revised procedural code

Tribunal Jurisdiction: Interpreting Parliament’s intention

Fladgate LLP | Employment Law Journal | September 2012 #133

Naomi Oppenheim and Nick Tsatsas review Underhill J’s proposal to broaden the type of claims that the employment tribunal has jurisdiction to hear

Working Time Regulations: Accruing holiday when sick

DLA Piper UK LLP | Employment Law Journal | September 2012 #133

Kate Hodgkiss welcomes a decision that has finally resolved the conflict in previous case law over employees’ right to take or carry over annual leave if they are on long-term sickness absence

Redundancy: Does somebody have to go?

Hogan Lovells | Employment Law Journal | September 2012 #133

Two contradictory EAT judgments have left it unclear whether a reduction in hours constitutes a redundancy situation, reports Louise Mason

Book Review: Navigating the choppy waters of private international law

Dechert LLP | Employment Law Journal | September 2012 #133

Charles Wynn-Evans commends a comprehensive account of the principles of conflict of laws in the context of employment contracts

Pre-Employment Checks: Barring scheme is overhauled

Trowers & Hamlins LLP | Employment Law Journal | September 2012 #133

Richie Alder and Anna Scott summarise imminent changes intended to scale back the process for vetting staff who work with children and at-risk adults

Employment Law Journal: September 2012 #133