Appeals: Mind the gap – is perversity an insurmountable chasm?

7 Bedford Row | Personal Injury Law Journal | February 2018 #162
Liam Ryan explores the recent Court of Appeal decision of Whiting v First/Keolis Transpennine Ltd and what it means more generally for appellants seeking to bring an appeal based on the difficult ground of perversity ‘The common-sense reality of the case was that once the evidence of Mr Stitt was accepted, Mr Whiting could not …

Continue reading "Appeals: Mind the gap – is perversity an insurmountable chasm?"

This post is only available to members.

Motor Insurance Fraud: The ‘trial mindset’

9 St John Street | Personal Injury Law Journal | July/August 2017 #157
Brian McCluggage argues for a greater focus on trial preparation in motor fraud cases ‘In the motor fraud context litigants need to get it right first time. The fact “fraud” is involved does not notably increase the willingness of the appellate courts to interfere with judgments perceived as unfair.’ This short article developed out of …

Continue reading "Motor Insurance Fraud: The ‘trial mindset’"

This post is only available to members.