Continue reading "Appeals: Mind the gap β is perversity an insurmountable chasm?"
Appeals: Mind the gap β is perversity an insurmountable chasm?
Liam Ryan explores the recent Court of Appeal decision of Whiting v First/Keolis Transpennine Ltd and what it means more generally for appellants seeking to bring an appeal based on the difficult ground of perversity βThe common-sense reality of the case was that once the evidence of Mr Stitt was accepted, Mr Whiting could not …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Fage UK Ltd v Chobani UK Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 5
- Hamid v Khalid [2017] EWCA Civ 201
- Subesh & ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 56
- Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46
- Whiting v First/Keolis Transpennine Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 4