Appeals: Mind the gap – is perversity an insurmountable chasm?

Liam Ryan explores the recent Court of Appeal decision of Whiting v First/Keolis Transpennine Ltd and what it means more generally for appellants seeking to bring an appeal based on the difficult ground of perversity β€˜The common-sense reality of the case was that once the evidence of Mr Stitt was accepted, Mr Whiting could not …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced