Conduct: Independent thinking

Commercial Chambers | The Commercial Litigation Journal | May/June 2013 #49
Martin Meredith analyses a recent ECJ decision on the role of in-house lawyers ‘The ECJ reinforced the Akzo reasoning that a lawyer’s independence can be determined positively – by reference to professional obligations – but also negatively by reference to the absence of an employment relationship.’ The decision of Prezes Urzedu Komunikacji Elekronicnej & Republic …

Continue reading "Conduct: Independent thinking"

This post is only available to members.

Privilege: A privileged upbringing

Baker McKenzie LLP | The Commercial Litigation Journal | March/April 2013 #48
Joanna Ludlam and Fiona Lockhart examine the likely impact of the Prudential judgment The provision of legal advice is not the sole preserve of lawyers and in these challenging commercial times clients do not want to have to pay for ‘legal filters’ (having their lawyers instruct third parties whom they could instruct themselves).In a much …

Continue reading "Privilege: A privileged upbringing"

This post is only available to members.

Discrimination Law: Claims by equity partners

Devereux Chambers | Employment Law Journal | November 2011 #125
Employment tribunals are increasingly having to resolve discrimination claims brought against partnerships. Suzanne McKie and Laura Bell look at the key issues ‘When seeking to resolve disputes within a partnership structure, it is common to have informal “without-prejudice chats” between partners to keep disputes low-key.’It is fair to say that equity partners are becoming increasingly …

Continue reading "Discrimination Law: Claims by equity partners"

This post is only available to members.

Evidence: All the cards on the table

Kennedys | The Commercial Litigation Journal | January/February 2011 #35
Mike Wells and Donald McDonald consider recent cases on evidence and privilege ‘Documents that appear pertinent at first sight may, in fact, be irrelevant as a matter of law and so rendered inadmissible. A familiar example of irrelevance as a matter of law is the inadmissibility of evidence as to the parties’ subjective intentions for …

Continue reading "Evidence: All the cards on the table"

This post is only available to members.