Planning permission: An end to ‘drop in’?

Victoria Tague and Nicola Gooch consider the implications of a recent Supreme Court judgment relating to subsequent permissions on a development with a pre-existing planning permission, including what this means for CIL The Supreme Court’s solution to the need to vary large multi-unit consents is to require a replacement application, covering the whole site, setting …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced

  • Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30
  • Pilkington v Secretary of State for the Environment [1973] 1 WLR 1527