Continue reading "Planning permission: An end to ‘drop in’?"
This post is only available to members.
Planning permission: An end to ‘drop in’?
Victoria Tague and Nicola Gooch consider the implications of a recent Supreme Court judgment relating to subsequent permissions on a development with a pre-existing planning permission, including what this means for CIL The Supreme Court’s solution to the need to vary large multi-unit consents is to require a replacement application, covering the whole site, setting …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30
- Pilkington v Secretary of State for the Environment [1973] 1 WLR 1527