This post is only available to members.
Trusts: Distinguishing between rules for ‘bare’ trusts and others involving a fiduciary duty
Kerry Bretherton KC and Katie Gray examine a case that finds that the service of a notice to quit is not a breach of trust Where parties have jointly contracted to rent a property and one of them wishes to quit, he or she cannot be held to a tenancy contract which is dependent for …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Cork v Cork [1997] 1 EGLR 5
- Crawley Borough Council v Ure [1996] QB 13
- Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk [1991] UKHL 6
- Harris v Black (1983) 46 P&CR 366
- Keech v Sandford [1726] EWHC J76
- Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley & anor [2001] EWCA Civ 601; [2001] WTLR 1353 CA
- Pile v Pile [2022] EWHC 2036 (Ch); [2022] WTLR 1445 ChD
- Procter v Procter [2022] EWHC 1202 (Ch) (to be reported in the web reports of the Wills and Trusts Law Reports)
- Protheroe v Protheroe [1968] 1 WLR 519
- Thompson’s Trustee in Bankruptcy v Heaton & ors [1974] 1 WLR 605