Continue reading "Schedule 1: Ripe for change?"
This post is only available to members.
Schedule 1: Ripe for change?
Aisling O’Reilly, Lois Rogers and Sophie Groves argue that more flexibility is needed in Sch 1 cases to avoid a ‘cliff edge’ when provision under an order comes to an end It is important that any developments in the law regarding Sch 1 cases do not resemble matrimonial rights ‘through the back door’, but the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- CA v DR [2021] EWFC 21
- Re A (a child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1577
- Re P (a child) (financial provision) [2003] EWCA Civ 837