Continue reading "The tech revolution: Can the law keep up with the pace of change?"
This post is only available to members.
The tech revolution: Can the law keep up with the pace of change?
Miri Stickland and Connor Morrison examine two recent cases in which the interplay between technology and ss1 and 2 of the 1989 Act is considered directly by the courts ‘While Yuen may not constitute binding authority, it does provide useful judicial direction on an important point on which there was previously no authority at all.’ …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Mehta v J Pereira Fernandes SA [2006] EWHC 813 (Ch)
- Neocleous & anor v Rees [2019] EWHC 2462 (Ch)
- Wood v Commercial First Business Ltd [2019] EWHC 2205 (Ch)
- Yuen v Wong [2020] First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ref 2016/1089