Private children: Protective barrier

Melanie Kalina provides a summary of the key aspects of orders prohibiting further applications under the Children Act 1989 without permission ‘The degree of restriction provided for in a section 91(14) order should be proportionate to the harm it is intended to avoid.’ Most practitioners have dealt with private children cases that never seem to …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced

  • DJ v MS [2006] EWHC 1491 (Fam)
  • F v M [2016] EWFC 40
  • K v Sheffield City Council (children) (guardianship order) [2011] EWCA Civ 635
  • Re A (Application for Leave) [1998] 1 FLR 1
  • Re B (Section 91(14) Order Duration) [2004] EWCA Civ 1996
  • Re G (a child) [2010] EWCA Civ 300
  • Re G (Residence: Restrictions on Further Applications) [2008] EWCA Civ 1468
  • Re G and M (Minors) (Contact) [1995] 2 FLR 416
  • Re M (a child) (restriction on applications) [2005] EWCA Civ 1696
  • Re N (children) [2019] EWCA Civ 903
  • Re N [2009] EWHC 3055 (Fam)
  • Re P (s91(14) Guidelines) (Residence and Religious Heritage) [1999] EWCA Civ 1323
  • Re S (Permission to Seek Relief) [2006] EWCA Civ 1190
  • Re T (A Child) (Suspension of Contact) (s91(14) CA 1989) [2015] EWCA Civ 719
  • S v B & anor; Re K [2007] 1 FLR 1116
  • Stringer v Stringer [2006] EWCA Civ 1617