Continue reading "Legal professional privilege: Behind closed doors"
This post is only available to members.
Legal professional privilege: Behind closed doors
Kelly Merris and Charlie Fikry provide an analysis of a case involving legal professional privilege where fraud was alleged and assess the wider implications ‘Legal professional privilege is considered a fundamental condition on which the administration of justice rests.’ In Bruzas v Saxton [2018] Holman J gave a preliminary judgment following a highly unusual sequence …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- B & ors v Auckland District Law Society [2003] UKPC 38
- Bruzas v Saxton [2018] EWHC 1619 (Fam)
- C v C (No 2) [2006] EWHC 336 (Fam)
- G v G [2015] EWHC 1512 (Fam)
- Gamlen Chemical Co (UK) Ltd v Rochem Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 614
- O'Rourke v Darbishire [1920] AC 581
- R v Derby Magistrate's Court ex parte B [1995] UKHL 18
- Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA Civ 95; [2015] UKSC 60
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No 6) [2003] EWCA Civ 474; [2004] UKHL 48
- Westminster Airways Ltd v Kuwait Oil Co Ltd [1951] 1 KB 134