Continue reading "TUPE: Potential transfer even with a long gap between contracts"
This post is only available to members.
TUPE: Potential transfer even with a long gap between contracts
A five-month gap between contracts did not prevent there being a transfer of an undertaking, explain Nicola Ihnatowicz and Anna Scott ‘The ECJ’s finding that a five-month gap in services did not necessarily preclude a finding that this was a going concern ties in with UK case law.’ The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Colino Sigüenza v Ayuntamiento de Valladolid & ors [2018] EUECJ C-472/16
- Ferreira da Silva e Brito & ors v Estado português [2015] EUECJ C-160/14
- Inex Home Improvements Ltd v Hodgkins & ors [2015] UKEAT 0329/14/2809
- Mustafa v Trek Highways Services Ltd [2016] UKEAT 0063/15/2901
- P Bork International A/S v Foreningen af Arbejdsledere i Danmark [1988] EUECJ C-101/87
- Wood v Caledon Social Club Ltd & anor [2010] UKEAT 0528/09/1203