QOCS And Set-Off: In the balance

Paul McGrath highlights when defendants should consider obtaining an order and/or assessment of costs ‘The power to order a set-off was available against damages and costs and was “no different from and no more extensive than the set-off available to or against parties who are not legally aided”.’ Where the standard provisions of QOCS apply, …
This post is only available to members.

Cases Referenced

  • Darini & anor v Markerstudy Group (2017) unreported Central London County Court HHJ Dight 24 April
  • Lockley v National Blood Transfusion Service [1992] 1 WLR 492
  • Nathanmanna v UK Insurance Company Ltd (2016) unreported Central London County Court DJ Avent 5 May
  • R (on the application of Burkett) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [2004] EWCA Civ 1342
  • Vava & ors v Anglo American South Africa Ltd [2013] EWHC 2326 QB