John Starr outlines the court’s stance on anti-oral variation clauses ‘In principle the fact that a contract includes an anti-oral variation clause does not prevent the parties from later making a new contract varying the original contract by oral agreement or by conduct.’ After several years without a decision on ‘no oral variation’ or ‘anti-oral …
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Beatty v Guggenheim Exploration Company (1919) 225 NY 380
- Globe Motors, Inc & ors v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Ltd & anor  EWCA Civ 396
- MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd  EWCA Civ 553
- United Bank Ltd v Asif (2000) unreported, EWCA, 11 February
- World Online Telecom Ltd v I-Way Ltd  EWCA Civ 413