Continue reading "Damages: Of little consequence"
Damages: Of little consequence
Jeremy Farr and Shawn Kirby discuss the interpretation of a consequential loss clause ‘The correct starting point of interpretation of the clause was with the natural and ordinary meaning of the language chosen by the parties to give effect to their intent.’ In a decision with potentially far-reaching implications for commercial parties generally and the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- A Turtle Offshore SA Assuranceforeningen Gard-Gjensidig v Superior Trading Inc [2008] EWHC 3034 (Admlty)
- Arnold v Britton & ors [2015] UKSC 36
- Caledonia North Sea Ltd v British Telecommunications plc (Scotland) & ors [2002] UKHL 4
- Croudace Construction Ltd v Cawoods Concrete Products Ltd (1978) 8 BLR 20
- Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemical Corporation v ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 387
- Gilbert Ash (Northern) Ltd v Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd [1974] AC 689
- Hadley v Baxendale [1854] EWHC Exch J70
- Hotel Services Ltd v Hilton International Hotels Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 74
- Nobahar-Cookson v The Hut Group Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 128
- Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980] UKHL 2
- Saint Line Ltd v Richardsons, Westgarth & Co Ltd [1940] 2 KB 99
- Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armement Maritime SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale [1967] 1 AC 361
- Transocean Drilling UK Ltd v Providence Resources plc [2016] EWCA Civ 372