Continue reading "Financial Provision: Limited consequences?"
This post is only available to members.
Financial Provision: Limited consequences?
Frances Bailey and Adrian Clossick look at the potential impact of the Supreme Court decision in Wyatt v Vince ‘Successful applications [for financial provision] after a lengthy period of separation are likely to be rare and in the authors’ view limited to cases where (per Rossi) “there has been a very good reason for the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Chambers v Chambers [1979] 1 FLR 10
- Dellal v Dellal & ors [2015] EWHC 907 (Fam)
- Hope & anor v Knight [2010] EWHC 3443 (Ch); [2011] WTLR 583
- M v L (Financial Relief After Overseas Divorce) [2003] EWHC 328 (Fam)
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- Pearce v Pearce [1980] 1 FLR 261
- Rossi v Rossi [2006] EWHC 1482 (Fam)
- Rubin v Rubin [2014] EWHC 611 (Fam)
- Vince v Wyatt [2013] EWCA Civ 495
- Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14