Continue reading "Undue Influence: After Etridge"
This post is only available to members.
Undue Influence: After Etridge
Nigel Thomas examines unconscionable bargains and presumed undue influence, with reference to Evans v Lloyd ‘This was a case of presumed undue influence and that being so then the claimants were required to prove (i) a relationship of trust and confidence and (ii) a transaction that calls for explanation.’ Some might be surprised that cases …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Allcard v Skinner (1887) LR 36 Ch D 145
- Evans & ors v Lloyd & anor [2013] WTLR 1137
- Huguenin v Baseley (1807) 14 Ves 273
- Langton v Langton [1995] 2 FLR 890
- Niersmans v Pesticcio [2004] EWCA Civ 372; [2004] WTLR 699
- Randall v Randall [2005] WTLR 119
- Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (AP) [2001] UKHL 44
- Turkey v Awadh [2005] EWCA Civ 382; [2006] WTLR 553