Continue reading "Collective Redundancy: Established law on ‘establishment’ overturned"
This post is only available to members.
Collective Redundancy: Established law on ‘establishment’ overturned
Stephen Levinson considers the fallout from the EAT’s decision in the Woolworths litigation ‘The EAT held that the words “at one establishment” in s188(i) could and should be ignored and held that each worker previously excluded should receive a protective award.’ As has been widely publicised, the law on collective redundancies has been reshaped in …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Athinaiki Chartopoiia AE v Panagiotidis [2007] IRLR 284
- Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30
- Lyttle v Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Ltd [2013] NIIT/00555/12IT; [2015] EUECJ C-182/13
- Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA [1990] EUECJ C-106/89
- Renfrewshire Council v Educational Institute of Scotland [2013] ICR 172
- Rockfon A/S v Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark [1996] EUECJ C-449/93
- USDAW v WW Realisation 1 Ltd [2012] EW Misc 2; [2013] UKEAT/0548/12/KN