Continue reading "Co-Owners In Actual Occupation: High priority"
This post is only available to members.
Co-Owners In Actual Occupation: High priority
Ruth Hughes considers the requirements of actual occupation and the level of involvement in a mortgage grant that will prevent a co-owner from claiming priority over the mortgagee A vivid example of the principle that a person prevented from being at a property against his will can nevertheless be in actual occupation of it is …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Abbey National Building Society v Cann [1990] UKHL 3
- Bank of Scotland v Hussain [2010] EWHC 2812 (Ch)
- Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314
- Chhokar v Chhokar [1983] EWCA Civ 7
- City of London Building Society v Flegg [1988] AC 54
- Hoggett v Hoggett (1980) 39 P & CR 121
- Inwards v Baker [1965] 2 QB 29
- Jones v Kernott [2009] EWHC 1713 (Ch); [2009] WTLR 1771; [2010] EWCA Civ 578; [2010] WTLR 1583; [2011] UKSC 53; [2012] WTLR 125
- Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424
- Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, [2004] WTLR 709
- Paddington Building Society v Mendelsohn [1985] 50 P&CR 244
- Powell v McFarlane (1977) 38 P&CR 452
- Skipton Building Society v Clayton (1993) 66 P&CR 223
- Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17; [2007] WTLR 1053 HL
- Strand Securities Ltd v Caswell [1965] Ch 958
- Thompson v Foy [2009] EWHC 1076 (Ch)
- Thorner v Major & ors [2009] UKHL 18; [2009] WTLR 713 HL
- Watson v Goldsbrough [1986] 1 EGLR 265
- Williams & Glyn's Bank v Boland Ltd [1980] UKHL 4