Continue reading "Financial Provision: Building fences"
This post is only available to members.
Financial Provision: Building fences
Tracey Dargan and Nathaniel Groarke summarise the courts’ approach to pre-acquired and inherited assets In N v F, Mostyn J stated that he would have excluded more of the husband’s pre-marital assets were it not for the fact that such assets were required to meet the wife’s needs. A number of recent reported cases have …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AR v AR (ancillary relief: inheritance) [2011] EWHC 2717 (Fam)
- B v B (Assessment of Assets: Pre-Marital Property) [2012] EWHC 314 (Fam)
- FZ v SZ & ors (ancillary relief: conduct) [2010] EWHC 1630 (Fam)
- Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41
- K v L (Ancillary Relief: Inherited Wealth) [2010] EWHC 1234 (Fam); [2011] EWCA Civ 550; [2012] WTLR 153
- Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24
- N v F (Financial Orders: Pre-acquired Wealth) [2011] EWHC 586 (Fam)
- Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171
- S v AG (Financial Orders: Lottery Prize) [2011] EWHC 2637 (Fam)
- WF v HF [2012] EWHC 438 (Fam)
- White v White [2000] UKHL 54