Continue reading "Court Orders: Revoking the rule"
This post is only available to members.
Court Orders: Revoking the rule
Setting aside court orders concerning payment from one party to another can be risky, as David de Ferrars explains ‘Mrs Morris’ counsel sought to argue that the receipt of the £1.481m by Mrs Morris as a purchaser for value without notice continued to govern her title to those monies, notwithstanding the subsequent rescission of the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Independent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd [2010] EWHC 1653 (Ch); [2012] EWCA Civ 195
- Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust plc [1995] EWCA Civ 55
- Re Diplocks Estate [1948] Ch 465
- Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington BC [1996] AC 669
- Wilkes v Spooner [1911] 2 KB 473