Continue reading "Vacant Possession: A practical overview"
This post is only available to members.
Vacant Possession: A practical overview
Dr Keith Shaw analyses the Court of Appeal decision in Ibrend Estates, and what vacant possession really means in practice ‘Tenants frequently misunderstand the requirements for the successful operation of a break option, and unwittingly find that they remain liable and tied to the covenants contained in their current lease because of a failure to …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Beard v Porter [1948] 1 KB 321
- Cumberland Consolidated Holdings Ltd v Ireland [1946] KB 264
- Hillingdon Estates Co v Stonefield Estates Ltd [1952] Ch 627
- Ibrend Estates BV v NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd [2010] PLSCS 186; [2011] EWCA Civ 683
- John Laing Construction Ltd v Amber Pass Ltd [2004] 17 EG 128
- Legal & General Assurance Society Ltd v Expeditors International (UK) Ltd [2006] EWHC 1008 (Ch)
- MW Trustees Ltd v Telular Corporation [2011] EWHC 104 (Ch)
- Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Preston [1957] 1 WLR 813
- NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683
- Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions v Baylis (Gloucester) Ltd and Bennett Construction (UK) Ltd [2000] 80 P&CR 324
- Sharneyford Supplies Ltd v Edge [1987] Ch 305
- Topfell Ltd v Galley Properties Ltd [1979] 1 WLR. 446