Continue reading "Trustees: Self-dealing – rigours and risks"
This post is only available to members.
Trustees: Self-dealing – rigours and risks
Brudenell-Bruce offers salutary lessons about the self-dealing rule, as Simon Atkinson explains ‘Brudenell-Bruce provides a restatement of the law relating to estoppel by deed and applies principles of construction to deeds and consent orders.’ For chancery practitioners Brudenell-Bruce (Earl of Cardigan) v Moore and Cotton [2012] provides valuable guidance in a number of areas. The …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Berkley v Poulett [1976] EWCA Civ 1
- Edge v Pensions Ombudsman [1999] EWCA Civ 2013
- Greer v Kettle [1938] AC 156
- Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328
- Pitt & anr v Holt & anr [2011] EWCA Civ 197; [2011] WTLR 623 CA
- Re Hastings-Bass [1974] EWCA Civ 13
- Re Thompson's Settlement [1986] Ch 99
- Sargeant v National Westminster Bank plc (1990) 61 P&CR 518
- Tito v Waddell (No. 2) [1977] Ch 106