Continue reading "Proprietary Estoppel: Deal or no deal"
This post is only available to members.
Proprietary Estoppel: Deal or no deal
Christopher Lloyd examines the current approach of the court to proprietary estoppel as indicated in Bradbury v Taylor</em Assurances or promises do not need to be the sole reason for the representee’s conduct: it is sufficient if they are an inducement. The inexorable rise in real property prices over the last half-century means that a …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Bradbury & ors v Taylor & anor [2012] WTLR 29
- Campbell v Griffin [2001] WTLR 981
- Crabb v Arun District Council [1975] EWCA Civ 7
- Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66; [2000] WTLR 195 CA
- Jennings v Rice & ors [2002] EWCA Civ 159; [2002] WTLR 367 CA
- Powell & anor v Benney [2007] EWCA Civ 1283
- Suggitt v Suggitt & anr [2012] EWCA Civ 1140; [2012] WTLR 1607 CA
- Thorner v Major & ors [2009] UKHL 18; [2009] WTLR 713 HL