Continue reading "IHT Planning: The mist has yet to clear"
This post is only available to members.
IHT Planning: The mist has yet to clear
Vinton v Fladgate Fielder gives some indication of the current approach of the courts towards negligent IHT planning, explains Michael O’Sullivan ‘The judge in Vinton v Fladgate Fielder [2010] considered that the claim for breach of contract brought by the claimants in their capacity as executors did have a real prospect of success, citing the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Carr-Glynn v Frearsons [1998] EWCA Civ 1325
- Chappell v Sommers & Blake [2003] WTLR 1085
- Daniels v Thompson [2004] WTLR 511
- Executors of Chapman (dec'd) v HMRCC [2008] WTLR 1359
- Gorham v BT plc [2000] 1 WLR 2129
- Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1963] UKHL 4
- Hughes & ors v Richards (t/a Colin Richards & Co) [2004] EWCA Civ 266
- Otter v Church Adams Tatham & Co [1953] Ch 280
- Rind v Theodore Goddard [2008] WTLR 699
- Swain v Hillman [1999] EWCA Civ 3053
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No 3) [2001] UKHL 16
- Vinton v Fladgate Fielder [2010] EWHC 904 (Ch); [2010] WTLR 1043
- White v Jones [1995] 2 Ac 207