Continue reading "Charities: Poor employees and poor relations"
This post is only available to members.
Charities: Poor employees and poor relations
Paul Ridout examines the consequences of the Upper Tribunal’s determination on the Attorney General’s Reference on benevolent funds and certain other poverty charities The tribunal followed its decision in the Independent Schools Council case and confirmed that different charitable purposes have different tests of public benefit. One single evening lecture, which formed part of my …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- A-G v Price (1810) 17 Ves 371
- Dingle v Turner [1972] AC 601
- Gibson v South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd [1949] Ch 572; [1950] Ch 177 (CA)
- HMAG v Charity Commission & ors [2012] WTLR 977
- Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2012] WTLR 41
- Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd [1950] UKHL 2
- Re Hummeltenberg [1923] 1 Ch 237
- Re Scarisbrick [1951] Ch 622
- Special Commissioners of Income Tax v Pemsel (1891) AC 531
- Spiller v Maude (1886) LR 32 Ch D 158 (Note)