Wills: Record, document and explain

Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan reveals the risk of delegating will drafting without care in conveying the testator’s intentions. Nisha Singh examines the case ‘Where a particular interpretation that is ambiguous on its face leads to a result that is irrational or capricious, the court will prefer an alternative interpretation that leads to …
This post is only available to members.

Schomberg & ors v Taylor & ors [2013] EWHC 2269 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | October 2013 #133

The testatrix (W) was the second wife of the late Brian Taylor (H) and had two step sons, David (D) and Paul (P), the first and second defendants. She had a sister, Penny, who married the eighth defendant, Mr Bruce Peskin (B), and who had three children, the fifth to seventh defendants, Cindy, Andrew and Dominic (the 2008 beneficiaries). W and H visited Penny and B, until a few years before they died. They stopped doing so after B, who was in financial difficulties, repeatedly pressurised them to obtain financial assistance in relation to a property development and sale. As a result of t...

Hart & anr v Burbidge & ors; Samways & ors v Burbidge & ors [2013] EWHC 1628 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | September 2013 #132

The deceased, Phyllis Hart née Samways (W) died on 7 November 2008 aged 86. Her husband (H) had died in January 2005. They left three children, two sons, Kenneth (K) and Paul Hart (P) and a daughter Susan Burbidge (S), who all have children of their own. W had a twin sister (J) who died four weeks after her and three other surviving siblings: Arthur, Graham and Christine (the Samways). Some eight years before he died H wished to sell the family firm to one of his children, but only S and her husband (B) were prepared to take it over on his terms, which did not include the transfer of the...

Williams v Wilmot [2012] EWHC 2211 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | September 2013 #132

The claimant sought probate of a will of Dr Cecil Monk (the deceased) dated 5 December 2003 by which the deceased left his entire estate to the claimant. The claimant also sought, in so far as it was necessary, an order that the deceased’s later will of 19 January 2007 be pronounced against on grounds of a lack of testamentary capacity and/or a lack of knowledge and approval.

The defendant, who did not appear and was not represented, was formerly engaged in caring for the deceased. He was an employee of a care agency to whom the relevant local authority had contracted out the care...

Wills: An unresolved question

David Schmitz considers whether the will must be present when a testator acknowledges their signature to witnesses ‘The existence of a perceived danger of substitution in some cases, and the desirability of reducing the need for oral evidence in consequent litigation, can justify the inference that the draftsman did intend to impose a requirement for …
This post is only available to members.

Wills: Code of practice needed?

The Court of Appeal decision in Burgess v Hawes has muddied the waters on capacity, and want of knowledge and approval. Martyn Frost explains why The importance of the experienced practitioner’s evidence is going to be determined by what they did and what they know of what they should be doing. The recent judgment from …
This post is only available to members.

Dalriada Trustees Ltd v Woodward & ors [2012] EWHC 2211 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | November 2012 #124

Wills: A new standard

Lucy Edwards outlines the changes in the second edition of the STEP Standard Provisions A balance needed to be struck between the potential unfairness that may result from trustees being heavy-handed with their powers on the one hand, and the usefulness of having greater flexibility on the other. The following scenario will be familiar to …
This post is only available to members.

Re Longman (dec’d) [2012] EWHC 666 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | October 2012 #123

Mrs Elizabeth Longman (D) died on 18 April 2008, leaving the residue of her estate equally to six charities if they were in existence at the date of her death. One of the six was the International Bible Society (UK) (IBS). When the will was made, IBS was an unincorporated association, but it had incorporated in May 2007 by transferring all its assets to a new charitable company, IBS-STL Ltd. Clause 6.3 of D’s will (see para [2] of the judgment below) provided that if one or more of the named charities merged or ceased to exist her trustees could pay its share of the residue to a...

Wills: Focus first

Anna Bruce-Smith sets out the lessons to be learned from Wharton v Bancroft ‘Mr Justice Norris went out of his way to commend counsel for keeping the number of witnesses to a minimum by weeding out the periphery testimonies, in particular those who seemed keen only to air their grievances against either White Horse or …
This post is only available to members.