HR Trustees Ltd v Wembley plc & anr WTLR(w) 2013-11

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Web Only

Trustees: Taking it personally

Trustees v Capmark Bank reminds us that trustees can be personally liable to third parties, as Marilyn McKeever discusses Trustees who enter into commercial agreements with third parties are personally liable on those contracts and they must be careful to protect their own position. The case of Trustees v Capmark Bank [2012] is a salutary …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: Anticipating family fallout

Scott has valuable lessons about the removal of trustees, as Ashley Crossley and Imogen Buchan-Smith explain In the judge’s provisional view, an independent professional trustee should be appointed as an additional trustee to ensure that decisions would be taken in the interests of the beneficiaries as a whole. The case is both a reminder of …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: Doing the right thing

Page v West [2010] elucidates the circumstances in which trustees should seek guidance from the court, as Olivia Knowles and Lynne Gregory explain Mr Justice Vos commented that it was unreasonable to expect trustees to seek planning permission in the current economic climate without the support of the majority of the beneficiaries.The application before the …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: An emerging pragmatism

Emily Campbell looks at recent cases that help to define the role of trustees in litigation ‘There are two main types of claim in litigation concerning a trust: ‘external’ disputes and ‘internal’ disputes. A typical example of an external dispute is a negligence claim by trustees against the trust accountants. A typical example of an …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: Information exchange

Katy Shayle considers the EU Savings Directive from a trustee’s perspective ‘The application of the Directive to trustees will depend upon whether there is an absolute entitlement to income arising under a trust, as an individual must be the beneficial owner of the income to be within scope Towards the end of the 1990s, the …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: When is a trustee not a trustee?

Judith Morris compares the approach of the Jersey court in Re BB, A and C with that of the English court in Jasmine Trustees Ltd v Wells Hind ‘Persons who have not been properly appointed as trustees, if they have acted in good faith, believing themselves to be duly appointed, are entitled to indemnity in …
This post is only available to members.

Dominion Corporate Trustees Ltd & anr v Capmark Bank Europe plc [2010] EWHC 1605 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2011 #115

The claimants were trustees of a Jersey property unit trust formed on 17 March 2006 as the vehicle for the purchase of warehouse premises (the property). It was arranged that the vendor of the property would transfer the property to the trustees in return for units, which would then be sold by the vendor to the purchasers. The purchasers were Cantabria Investments Limited (Cantabria) as to 99% of the units and Catalunya Investments Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Cantabria) as to 1%. Cantabria was partly owned by Glenmac Limited (Glenmac). Half of Glenmac’s share capital was ...

Howell & ors v Lees-Millais & ors [2011] EWCA Civ 786

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2011 #115

The appellant trustees sought permission to appeal from a costs order. An application had been issued in December 2006 pursuant to which the trustees sought sanction to pursue claims for (inter alia) breach of trust. Three related beneficiaries (Lorna, Fiona and Marcus) resisted the application as defendants, save in respect of a negligence claim against solicitors. In July 2008, Lindsay J declined to sanction any of the claims (save for the negligence claim) and made clear that the trustees had acted in an inappropriately partisan way. Directions were given for a costs hearing,...

Trustees: Sensible streamlining

The consultation on ss31 and 32 of the Trustee Act 1925 introduces positive changes, finds Laurence Morgan ‘To draw a dividing line between statutory trusts on intestacy, on the one hand, and trusts established by will or in the settlor’s lifetime on the other, could create confusion and a potential trap for trustees and professional …
This post is only available to members.