The British University in Dubai v Ebrahimi [2021] WTLR 703

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2021 #183

The deceased died on 4 July 2018 leaving a disputed will, dated 3 May 2018, probate of which was granted to the defendant, who together with his wife were the only beneficiaries.

The 2018 will was a holographic one-page will. On one side it bore the signatures of two witnesses who, it was common ground, had witnessed the testator’s signature on 4 May 2018 when not together at the same time and so did not validly attest the will in accordance with s9, Wills Act 1837. On the reverse of the will were two further signatures dated 3 May 2018, belonging to two further wit...

Remote hearings: A review of practical tips, one year on

Harriet Holmes reviews the situation just over a year on, and provides some practical tips from the viewpoint of someone who has done several remote hearings, by telephone and video, of various lengths The need for proper and timely preparation for a remote hearing cannot be underestimated. The senior judiciary said, in March 2020, that …
This post is only available to members.

Remote hearings: Exceptional measures

Anna-Laura Lock and Hannah Gumbrill-Ward analyse the impact of Covid-19 and the use of remote and hybrid hearings on the family justice system The family court system was already struggling to cope with huge demands on the courts being administered by reduced court staff and a lack of judges. In C (A Child) [2020], Judd …
This post is only available to members.