McLean & ors v McLean [2023] WTLR 1495
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Winter 2023 #193In 2017 a husband and wife executed mirror wills leaving their respective estates to the survivor and the residue to their four children in equal shares. In March 2019 the husband died and the wife inherited his estate. In August 2019 the wife executed a new will leaving her entire estate to one son, the defendant in the proceedings. She died 11 days afterwards. The three remaining children argued that the 2017 wills were mutual and that the wife’s estate was therefore held on trust for them equally. They relied on a conversation between the husband and wife and their solicitor where, in...
McLean & ors v McLean [2023] WTLR 267
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Spring 2023 #190The claimants were all siblings and the biological children of Reginald McLean (Reginald), by his first marriage. The defendant was the biological child of Reginald and his second wife, Maureen (the deceased).
By mirror wills executed on 23 June 2017, Reginald and the deceased both left their estates to each other as survivors, and the residuary estate of the surviving spouse to the claimants and the defendant in equal shares (the 2017 wills). Following Reginald’s death, the deceased executed a new will on 16 August 2019 (the 2019 will) revoking her 2017 will and leaving her entir...
Marley v Rawlings & anr [2012] WTLR 639
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | May 2012 #119Alfred Thomas Rawlings (H) and Maureen Catherine Rawlings (W) were husband and wife who, on 17 May 1999, signed mirror wills leaving their entire estate to each other or, if the other failed to survive, to the appellant who was treated as their son. The respondents, who were their natural sons, were excluded but stood to benefit on intestacy if the wills were invalid. In the event, by mistake H signed W’s will and W signed H’s will but the error was not noticed then, or on the death of W. It was only noticed after the death of H in August 2006 when a dispute arose as to whether the estat...