Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2023] WTLR 605

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2023 #191

Shepherd & Co Solicitors v Brealey [2023] WTLR 755

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2023 #191

The testatrix by her will appointed her brother, Mr Robin Shepherd (a solicitor), ‘and the partners at the time of my death in the firm of Shepherd and Co [being Mr Shepherd’s firm]’ as her executors. The will made no provision for remuneration of executors. Mr Shepherd’s firm (the appellant) was retained by the executors and the retainer was signed by the brother alone. Mr Shepherd did work in his capacity as executor of the estate of the deceased and the appellant rendered a bill to the estate. The testatrix’s son (the respondent) brought third-party assessment proceedings pursuant to<...

Totton & anr v Totton WTLR(w) 2023-03

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Web Only

Executors: Do not pass go

A recent High Court decision to impose a custodial sentence on an executor is a warning to lax executors and administrators of estates everywhere. Laura Abbott discusses Totton This case is a stark reminder of the duties of an executor and the significant consequences of a failure to comply with them. An executor’s duties are …
This post is only available to members.

Ingham & anr v Wardman & ors [2022] WTLR 1337

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Winter 2022 #189

The appellants (the Inghams) appealed against an interlocutory ruling which set aside a privacy order.

In the proceedings below, the Inghams were seeking permission (the permission application) to bring a derivative claim (the derivative claim) on behalf of the estate of their grandmother, the late Elfrida Louise Chappell deceased (the deceased), on the basis that the executors of the deceased’s estate, Butterfield Trust (Bermuda) Ltd and Stephen Kempe (the executors), were unable to bring that claim due to alleged conflicts of interest. The derivative claim would allege that the ...

Jennison & anr v Jennison [2022] WTLR 1027

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Autumn 2022 #188

The claimant at first instance was the widow of the deceased and the personal representative of his estate. The defendants were the deceased’s brother and sister-in-law. The claimant sought declaratory relief, an order for sale and compensation flowing from the defendants’ alleged breach of trust in dealing with land. The defendants defended the claim on the basis of a lack of standing as the claim form had been issued before the foreign grant of probate was resealed in the UK. The defendants appealed the refusal to grant them summary judgment or strike out on this basis.

Held (d...

Executors: When profession counts

Catherine Pugsley and Laura Southern report on executors’ misplaced reliance on charging clauses The issue of the case was whether an executor, who was involved in a profession or business which was ‘unrelated to the administration of trusts or estates’, could rely on the professional charging clause. It is generally held that the job of …
This post is only available to members.

Executors: More than friction

Recent case law has clarified when the court considers an executor can be removed due to the breakdown of the relationship with the beneficiaries. Laura Abbott explains Executors have a duty to administer the estate in accordance with law and in a timely manner, and to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries, not …
This post is only available to members.

Hudman v Morris [2021] WTLR 877

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Autumn 2021 #184

The claimant was the executrix and one of five residuary beneficiaries of the estate of her late father. The defendant, her brother, was the co-executor and a fellow residuary beneficiary. The claimant brought a Part 8 claim under s50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 to remove the defendant as executor and, alternatively, sought an order that the defendant be passed over pursuant to s116 of the Senior Courts Act 1981. The claimant also sought the appointment of an independent administrator and was voluntarily willing to step down as executrix ...

Crabbe v Townsend [2016] EWHC 2450 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | January/February 2017 #166

The deceased was survived by his daughter (the claimant) and his son (the defendant). The deceased died in 2004 and a grant of probate was extracted in May 2007. By his will the claimant and defendant were appointed as his executors and trustees. Various issues relating to the administration of the estate arose (see para 3). Among these was a portfolio of stocks and shares given to the claimant by the deceased’s will. It was not until February 2013 that the portfolio was assented to the claimant, and then only because she assented it to herself without the defendant’s concurr...