Gordon v Legister [2014] EWHC 2041 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2014 #145

The claimant (Arlene) applied for reasonable financial provision from the estate of Alonzo Legister (the deceased) as someone maintained by the deceased immediately before his death under s1(1)(e) of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) 1975 (the 1975 Act). The claim was contested by the defendant, who was the administrator of the estate and one of the residuary beneficiaries on Alonzo’s intestacy. It was Arlene’s case that she was cohabiting with the deceased prior to his death. However, it was accepted that even on her case she wa...

Cohabitants: Scotland the brave

Brenda Long and Claire Dyer contemplate the lessons to be learnt from the Supreme Court decision in Gow v Grant Scottish lawyers identified a lack of public knowledge about the ability to pursue claims and difficulties in understanding the provisions and the advice they were given. The Scottish case of Gow v Grant [2012] recently …
This post is only available to members.

Cohabitants: Clear intentions

Ellie Foster summarises the Supreme Court decision in Jones v Kernott and considers its impact ‘There is a real practical difficulty when it comes to analysing the respective contributions made to a property over a long period of cohabitation.’ The Supreme Court has been tasked with an unusually high amount of family work in recent …
This post is only available to members.