Continue reading "Practice: Doing it yourself"
This post is only available to members.
Practice: Doing it yourself
Thomas Crockett looks at recent judicial guidance on litigants in person In Tinkler, Sharpe J concluded that the specific facts of the case, none less than the fact that Mr Elliott was a LIP, allowed her to exercise her discretion to find that Mr Elliott had acted ‘promptly’ for the purposes of CPR 39.3(5). It …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Teinaz v London Borough of Wandsworth [2002] EWCA Civ 1040
- Tinkler v Elliott [2012] EWHC 600 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1289
- Watson v Bluemoor Properties Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1875