Continue reading "Company: Dance of the corporate veil"
This post is only available to members.
Company: Dance of the corporate veil
Clare Arthurs and Alex Fox reflect on the Supreme Court judgment in Nutritek The Supreme Court clearly declined to extend the circumstances in which the corporate veil may be pierced. The corporate veil has been in the limelight of late. The Court of Appeal in VTB Capital v Nutritek International Corp [2012] kept it drawn …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] Ch 433
- Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corp v Stepanovs [2011] EWHC 333 (Comm)
- Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby [2000] EWHC 1560 (Ch); [2001] WTLR 825
- Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne [1933] Ch 935
- Hashem v Shayif [2008] EWHC 2380 (Fam)
- Petrodel Resources Ltd & ors v Prest & ors [2012] EWCA Civ 1395
- Re A Company [1985] BCLC 333
- Re Darby ex p Brougham [1911] 1 KB 95
- Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1
- VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp [2012] EWCA Civ 808; [2013] UKSC 5