Detrimental reliance: An unwelcome development

Oliver Foy explains why the reasoning in Hudson v Hathway is both wrong and undesirable in the context of common intention constructive trusts Common intention on its own does not justify a trust. Something more is needed to obviate s53(1)(b) of the Law of Property Act 1925 and bestow the beneficiary with a beneficial interest. …
This post is only available to members.

Trusts: Doing away with the need for detrimental reliance

Guy Holland analyses whether a cohabitee’s beneficial interest can be varied by express agreement alone In finding that detrimental reliance was not the only route to establishing unconscionability, Kerr J has identified a clear distinction between the approach to be adopted in single name and joint name cases. It is well established that detrimental reliance …
This post is only available to members.